FDUS
Price
$19.03
Change
+$0.28 (+1.49%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
693.22M
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GSBD
Price
$9.60
Change
+$0.04 (+0.42%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDUS vs GSBD

Header iconFDUS vs GSBD Comparison
Open Charts FDUS vs GSBDBanner chart's image
Fidus Investment
Price$19.03
Change+$0.28 (+1.49%)
Volume$146.48K
Capitalization693.22M
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$9.60
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
Volume$968.38K
Capitalization1.1B
FDUS vs GSBD Comparison Chart in %
FDUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDUS vs. GSBD commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDUS is a Buy and GSBD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FDUS: $19.03 vs. GSBD: $9.60)
Brand notoriety: FDUS and GSBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDUS: 52% vs. GSBD: 78%
Market capitalization -- FDUS: $693.22M vs. GSBD: $1.1B
FDUS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $693.22M. GSBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDUS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDUS is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDUS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GSBD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDUS is a better buy in the short-term than GSBD.

Price Growth

FDUS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.11% price change this week, while GSBD (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDUS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.89% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.1B) has a higher market cap than FDUS($693M). GSBD (8.35) and FDUS (8.13) have similar P/E ratio . FDUS YTD gains are higher at: -1.914 vs. GSBD (-9.166). FDUS has less debt than GSBD: FDUS (534M) vs GSBD (1.84B). GSBD has higher revenues than FDUS: GSBD (147M) vs FDUS (96.8M).
FDUSGSBDFDUS / GSBD
Capitalization693M1.1B63%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.914-9.16621%
P/E Ratio8.138.3597%
Revenue96.8M147M66%
Total CashN/A108M-
Total Debt534M1.84B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDUS vs GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
FDUS
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7164
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
4028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7475
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3696
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a6

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDUS's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (9). This means that FDUS’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSBD (100). This means that FDUS’s stock grew significantly faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as FDUS (40). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to FDUS’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (75). This means that FDUS’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (96). This means that FDUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDUSGSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSZIX17.370.11
+0.64%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Z
FNKIX16.590.05
+0.30%
Frank Value Instl
TSEMX17.030.03
+0.18%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr Y
FAFSX37.67N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Financials M
TCGRX33.64-0.02
-0.06%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth R4

FDUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDUS has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDUS jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDUS
1D Price
Change %
FDUS100%
+1.49%
ARCC - FDUS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
BCSF - FDUS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
MFIC - FDUS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
SLRC - FDUS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
GSBD - FDUS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with MFIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then MFIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
+0.42%
MFIC - GSBD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
BCSF - GSBD
80%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
CSWC - GSBD
80%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
GBDC - GSBD
80%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
OBDC - GSBD
79%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
More