FDUS
Price
$19.06
Change
-$0.46 (-2.36%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
694.31M
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GSBD
Price
$9.20
Change
-$0.34 (-3.56%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.05B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDUS vs GSBD

Header iconFDUS vs GSBD Comparison
Open Charts FDUS vs GSBDBanner chart's image
Fidus Investment
Price$19.06
Change-$0.46 (-2.36%)
Volume$294.78K
Capitalization694.31M
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$9.20
Change-$0.34 (-3.56%)
Volume$2.15M
Capitalization1.05B
FDUS vs GSBD Comparison Chart in %
FDUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDUS vs. GSBD commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDUS is a Hold and GSBD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FDUS: $19.06 vs. GSBD: $9.20)
Brand notoriety: FDUS and GSBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDUS: 96% vs. GSBD: 146%
Market capitalization -- FDUS: $694.31M vs. GSBD: $1.05B
FDUS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $694.31M. GSBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDUS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDUS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDUS is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDUS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDUS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GSBD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDUS is a better buy in the short-term than GSBD.

Price Growth

FDUS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while GSBD (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDUS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.42% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.05B) has a higher market cap than FDUS($694M). FDUS (8.15) and GSBD (8.00) have similar P/E ratio . GSBD YTD gains are higher at: -0.862 vs. FDUS (-1.244). FDUS has less debt than GSBD: FDUS (534M) vs GSBD (1.84B). GSBD has higher revenues than FDUS: GSBD (147M) vs FDUS (96.8M).
FDUSGSBDFDUS / GSBD
Capitalization694M1.05B66%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.244-0.862144%
P/E Ratio8.158.00102%
Revenue96.8M147M66%
Total CashN/A115M-
Total Debt534M1.84B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDUS vs GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
FDUS
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
657
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20100
SMR RATING
1..100
3928
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7274
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4996
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDUS's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (7). This means that FDUS’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSBD (100). This means that FDUS’s stock grew significantly faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as FDUS (39). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to FDUS’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's Price Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (74). This means that FDUS’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (96). This means that FDUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDUSGSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDUS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCDCX25.240.37
+1.49%
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv C
ECRAX15.85-0.01
-0.06%
Eaton Vance All Asset Strategy C
JNBSX10.67-0.01
-0.09%
JPMorgan Income Builder I
EGOCX18.41-0.13
-0.70%
Allspring Large Cap Core C
TMCGX15.18-0.19
-1.24%
Thrivent Mid Cap Growth S

FDUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDUS has been closely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDUS jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDUS
1D Price
Change %
FDUS100%
-1.19%
BCSF - FDUS
81%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
MFIC - FDUS
80%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
ARCC - FDUS
79%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
SLRC - FDUS
79%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
GSBD - FDUS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
More

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
-0.65%
OBDC - GSBD
82%
Closely correlated
-3.48%
TSLX - GSBD
81%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
BXSL - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
-2.43%
CGBD - GSBD
75%
Closely correlated
-2.48%
MFIC - GSBD
72%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More