Advertisement
FDTX vs MRVL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTX is a Hold and MRVL is a Hold.
MRVL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FDTX | MRVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 19 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSDAX | 13.25 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock SMID-Cap Growth Equity Inv A | |||
| OAKBX | 36.57 | -0.34 | -0.92% |
| Oakmark Equity And Income Investor | |||
| DCINX | 18.03 | -0.17 | -0.93% |
| Dunham International Stock C | |||
| SAMVX | 11.54 | -0.16 | -1.37% |
| Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity A | |||
| SCCVX | 12.74 | -0.25 | -1.92% |
| AB Small Cap Value C | |||
FDTX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTX has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDTX jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTX | 100% | -2.09% | ||
| NVDA - FDTX | 81% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| AMZN - FDTX | 80% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| MRVL - FDTX | 79% Closely correlated | -3.52% | ||
| TSM - FDTX | 78% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| SNPS - FDTX | 78% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
More | ||||
MRVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRVL has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MRVL jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRVL | 100% | -3.52% | ||
| NVDA - MRVL | 70% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| AVGO - MRVL | 69% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| TSM - MRVL | 69% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| MTSI - MRVL | 68% Closely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| ASX - MRVL | 68% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||