Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs PDN
FDTS vs PDN Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs PDN
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$55.36
Change+$0.50 (+0.91%)
Volume$146
Net Assets8.36M
Invesco RAFI Developed Mkts ex-US S-METF
Price$40.88
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
Volume$100
Net Assets362.05M
FDTS vs PDN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. PDN commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and PDN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDN has more net assets: 362M vs. FDTS (8.36M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than PDN: FDTS (41.825) vs PDN (32.591). FDTS was incepted earlier than PDN: FDTS (14 years) vs PDN (18 years). PDN (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover PDN (30.00) vs PDN (30.00).
| FDTS | PDN | FDTS / PDN | |
| Gain YTD | 41.825 | 32.591 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 8.36M | 362M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.49 | 163% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 30.00 | 390% |
| Yield | 3.20 | 3.02 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | PDN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| KAR - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
PDN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDN has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PDN jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y