Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs PDN
FDTS vs PDN Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs PDN
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$50.42
Change+$0.42 (+0.84%)
Volume$172
Net Assets7.52M
Invesco RAFI Developed Mkts ex-US S-METF
Price$38.81
Change+$0.18 (+0.47%)
Volume$3.1K
Net Assets356.34M
FDTS vs PDN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. PDN commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and PDN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDN has more net assets: 356M vs. FDTS (7.52M). FDTS (24.640) and PDN (24.337) have matching annual dividend yield . FDTS was incepted earlier than PDN: FDTS (13 years) vs PDN (18 years). PDN (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover PDN (30.00) vs PDN (30.00).
| FDTS | PDN | FDTS / PDN | |
| Gain YTD | 24.640 | 24.337 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 7.52M | 356M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.49 | 163% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 30.00 | 390% |
| Yield | 3.13 | 3.11 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | PDN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with CE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then CE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| CE - FDTS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| BEN - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| ARE - FDTS | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| KAR - FDTS | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
More | ||||
PDN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDN has been loosely correlated with ERO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDN jumps, then ERO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y