Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs PDN
FDTS vs PDN Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs PDN
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$61.45
Change+$0.53 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.25M
Invesco RAFI Developed Mkts ex-US S-METF
Price$43.69
Change+$0.28 (+0.65%)
Volume$215
Net Assets369.7M
FDTS vs PDN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. PDN commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and PDN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDN has more net assets: 370M vs. FDTS (9.25M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than PDN: FDTS (4.372) vs PDN (2.902). FDTS was incepted earlier than PDN: FDTS (14 years) vs PDN (18 years). PDN (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover PDN (30.00) vs PDN (30.00).
| FDTS | PDN | FDTS / PDN | |
| Gain YTD | 4.372 | 2.902 | 151% |
| Net Assets | 9.25M | 370M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.49 | 163% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 30.00 | 390% |
| Yield | 2.93 | 3.36 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | PDN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| CG - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
PDN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDN has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PDN jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y