Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs FYLD
FDTS vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs FYLD
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$65.81
Change+$0.53 (+0.81%)
Volume$100
Net Assets9.63M
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$36.11
Change+$0.24 (+0.67%)
Volume$6K
Net Assets550.66M
FDTS vs FYLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. FYLD commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and FYLD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYLD has more net assets: 551M vs. FDTS (9.63M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than FYLD: FDTS (11.844) vs FYLD (10.403). FDTS was incepted earlier than FYLD: FDTS (14 years) vs FYLD (12 years). FYLD (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover FYLD (52.00) vs FYLD (52.00).
| FDTS | FYLD | FDTS / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 11.844 | 10.403 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 9.63M | 551M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.59 | 136% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 52.00 | 225% |
| Yield | 2.64 | 3.75 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 29 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.73% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| CG - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.46% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | +4.83% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| TTE - FYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 67% Closely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| CNQ - FYLD | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.68% | ||
More | ||||