Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs FNDC
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs FNDC
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$55.91
Change-$0.38 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.48M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.45
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Volume$200
Net Assets3B
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. FNDC commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and FNDC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3B vs. FDTS (8.48M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: FDTS (44.223) vs FNDC (30.959). FDTS was incepted earlier than FNDC: FDTS (14 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FDTS | FNDC | FDTS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 44.223 | 30.959 | 143% |
| Net Assets | 8.48M | 3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.39 | 205% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 33.00 | 355% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 2.61 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| KAR - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.50% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||