Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs FNDC
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs FNDC
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$61.45
Change+$0.53 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.25M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$46.13
Change+$0.33 (+0.72%)
Volume$113.8K
Net Assets3.13B
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. FNDC commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.13B vs. FDTS (9.25M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: FDTS (4.372) vs FNDC (3.547). FDTS was incepted earlier than FNDC: FDTS (14 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FDTS | FNDC | FDTS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 4.372 | 3.547 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 9.25M | 3.13B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.39 | 205% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 33.00 | 355% |
| Yield | 2.93 | 3.84 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 13 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| CG - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.39% | ||
More | ||||