Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs FNDC
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs FNDC
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$55.36
Change+$0.50 (+0.91%)
Volume$146
Net Assets8.36M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Volume$95.74K
Net Assets2.96B
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. FNDC commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.96B vs. FDTS (8.36M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: FDTS (41.825) vs FNDC (30.135). FDTS was incepted earlier than FNDC: FDTS (14 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FDTS | FNDC | FDTS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 41.825 | 30.135 | 139% |
| Net Assets | 8.36M | 2.96B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.39 | 205% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 33.00 | 355% |
| Yield | 3.20 | 2.60 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| KAR - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||