Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTRX vs GFAFX
FDTRX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDTRX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
FDTRX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTRX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTRX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FDTRX (29B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FDTRX: GFAFX (0.29) vs FDTRX (0.00). FDTRX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FDTRX (12 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FDTRX (0.45). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDTRX (11.94). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDTRX: GFAFX (250) vs FDTRX (1000000). FDTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.43 vs. GFAFX (11.53). FDTRX return over 5 years is better than : 63.39 vs. GFAFX (40.02).
| FDTRX | GFAFX | FDTRX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.67 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.67 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.488 | 17.923 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 336B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.43 | 11.53 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 123.71 | 72.21 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.39 | 40.02 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 345.83 | 100.61 | 344% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement