Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs PGLOX
FDTGX vs PGLOX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs PGLOX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$85.63
Change+$0.34 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer
Price$18.42
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.07M
FDTGX vs PGLOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. PGLOX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a StrongBuy and PGLOX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. PGLOX (37.1M). FDTGX pays higher dividends than PGLOX: FDTGX (1.47) vs PGLOX (0.17). FDTGX was incepted earlier than PGLOX: FDTGX (19 years) vs PGLOX (9 years). PGLOX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. PGLOX (18.90). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGLOX: FDTGX (0) vs PGLOX (2500). PGLOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.68 vs. FDTGX (-5.01). PGLOX return over 5 years is better than : 23.44 vs. FDTGX (10.35).
| FDTGX | PGLOX | FDTGX / PGLOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.05 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.089 | 5.680 | -19% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 37.1M | 3,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.17 | 868% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.01 | 14.68 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.14 | 40.17 | -0% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.35 | 23.44 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement