Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs PGLOX
FDTGX vs PGLOX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs PGLOX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$82.62
Change-$0.17 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer
Price$18.54
Change-$0.23 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.11M
FDTGX vs PGLOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. PGLOX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and PGLOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. PGLOX (27.1M). FDTGX pays higher dividends than PGLOX: FDTGX (1.43) vs PGLOX (0.17). FDTGX was incepted earlier than PGLOX: FDTGX (19 years) vs PGLOX (9 years). PGLOX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. PGLOX (18.90). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGLOX: FDTGX (0) vs PGLOX (2500). PGLOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. FDTGX (-10.34). PGLOX return over 5 years is better than : 11.04 vs. FDTGX (-3.03).
| FDTGX | PGLOX | FDTGX / PGLOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.05 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.123 | 7.688 | -54% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 27.1M | 3,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.17 | 865% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.34 | 8.24 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.88 | 41.98 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.03 | 11.04 | -27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement