Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTCX vs RGAHX
FDTCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDTCX vs RGAHX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock C
Price$34.88
Change-$0.58 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.89B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.59
Change-$1.37 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FDTCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 171.4B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 3.89B to 338.91B. RGAHX holds the highest valuation in this group at 338.91B. The lowest valued company is FDTCX at 3.89B.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 15%. FDTCX experienced the highest price growth at 1%, while RGAHX experienced the biggest fall at 1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
FDTCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTCX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FDTCX (3.89B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDTCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs FDTCX (0.00). FDTCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDTCX (20 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FDTCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). FDTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDTCX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. FDTCX (-4.76). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.15 vs. FDTCX (17.04).
| FDTCX | RGAHX | FDTCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.44 | 364% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.44 | 364% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.882 | 21.133 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.89B | 339B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | 6.96 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.63 | 69.28 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.04 | 34.15 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.31 | 103.33 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement