FDSB
Price
$13.19
Change
+$0.09 (+0.69%)
Updated
Aug 11, 10:32 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.83M
TFC
Price
$42.85
Change
-$0.22 (-0.51%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
55.54B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDSB vs TFC

Header iconFDSB vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts FDSB vs TFCBanner chart's image
Fifth District Ban
Price$13.19
Change+$0.09 (+0.69%)
Volume$100
Capitalization72.83M
Truist Financial
Price$42.85
Change-$0.22 (-0.51%)
Volume$62.78K
Capitalization55.54B
FDSB vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDSB vs. TFC commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSB is a Hold and TFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FDSB: $13.10 vs. TFC: $43.07)
Brand notoriety: FDSB and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDSB: 11% vs. TFC: 71%
Market capitalization -- FDSB: $72.83M vs. TFC: $55.54B
FDSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $72.83M. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $55.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDSB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDSB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDSB is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FDSB and TFC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FDSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.63% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($55.5B) has a higher market cap than FDSB($72.8M). FDSB has higher P/E ratio than TFC: FDSB (551.74) vs TFC (11.67). FDSB YTD gains are higher at: 3.803 vs. TFC (2.996). FDSB has less debt than TFC: FDSB (0) vs TFC (61.1B).
FDSBTFCFDSB / TFC
Capitalization72.8M55.5B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.8032.996127%
P/E Ratio551.7411.674,727%
Revenue12.1MN/A-
Total CashN/A5.16B-
Total Debt061.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TFC: Fundamental Ratings
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSBTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DYNF56.640.62
+1.11%
iShares U.S. Equity Fac Rotation Act ETF
JETS23.660.07
+0.28%
US Global Jets ETF
ZFEB24.630.05
+0.21%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrFeb
LKOR42.33-0.21
-0.50%
FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF
BKCH55.96-0.85
-1.50%
Global X Blockchain ETF

FDSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDSB and BOKF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDSB and BOKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDSB
1D Price
Change %
FDSB100%
+0.69%
BOKF - FDSB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMA - FDSB
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
TFC - FDSB
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
HBNC - FDSB
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
CBSH - FDSB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
+1.75%
CFG - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
HBAN - TFC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
PNC - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
FITB - TFC
89%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
FNB - TFC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
More