FDS
Price
$369.62
Change
-$5.34 (-1.42%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
13.97B
31 days until earnings call
MSCI
Price
$557.02
Change
-$8.70 (-1.54%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
43.09B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MSCI

Header iconFDS vs MSCI Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs MSCIBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$369.62
Change-$5.34 (-1.42%)
Volume$491.8K
Capitalization13.97B
MSCI
Price$557.02
Change-$8.70 (-1.54%)
Volume$372.33K
Capitalization43.09B
FDS vs MSCI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MSCI commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Hold and MSCI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $369.62 vs. MSCI: $556.86)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MSCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 130% vs. MSCI: 51%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $13.97B vs. MSCI: $43.09B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $13.97B. MSCI’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $43.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $169.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the long-term than FDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSCI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MSCI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSCI is a better buy in the short-term than FDS.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -3.35% price change this week, while MSCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Sep 18, 2025.

MSCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.30% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSCI($43.1B) has a higher market cap than FDS($14B). MSCI has higher P/E ratio than FDS: MSCI (36.91) vs FDS (26.67). MSCI YTD gains are higher at: -6.308 vs. FDS (-22.682). FDS has less debt than MSCI: FDS (1.62B) vs MSCI (4.63B).
FDSMSCIFDS / MSCI
Capitalization14B43.1B32%
EBITDA888MN/A-
Gain YTD-22.682-6.308360%
P/E Ratio26.6736.9172%
Revenue2.29BN/A-
Total Cash364MN/A-
Total Debt1.62B4.63B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MSCI: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MSCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5081
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8057
SMR RATING
1..100
378
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSCI's Valuation (5) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (67). This means that MSCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (80). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's SMR Rating (8) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (37). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (65). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MSCI's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (70). This means that MSCI’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMSCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCQ8.20N/A
+0.06%
Pimco California Municipal Income Fund
PMFB25.66N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February
VPLS77.66-0.09
-0.12%
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
VTWO91.85-0.41
-0.44%
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
TARK66.18-0.39
-0.59%
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-1.42%
MORN - FDS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
MCO - FDS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
SPGI - FDS
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
NDAQ - FDS
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MSCI - FDS
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
More

MSCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSCI has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSCI jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSCI
1D Price
Change %
MSCI100%
-1.25%
MCO - MSCI
66%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
MORN - MSCI
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
SPGI - MSCI
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
NDAQ - MSCI
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
TRU - MSCI
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
More