FDS
Price
$223.75
Change
+$1.13 (+0.51%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.26B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MORN
Price
$182.00
Change
+$1.61 (+0.89%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.42B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MORN

Header iconFDS vs MORN Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs MORNBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$223.75
Change+$1.13 (+0.51%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.26B
Morningstar
Price$182.00
Change+$1.61 (+0.89%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.42B
FDS vs MORN Comparison Chart in %
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MORN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MORN commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and MORN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FDS: $222.62 vs. MORN: $180.39)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MORN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 311% vs. MORN: 229%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $8.26B vs. MORN: $7.42B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $8.26B. MORN’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $7.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $141.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $28.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMORN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MORN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than MORN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MORN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MORN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than MORN.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -17.14% price change this week, while MORN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -11.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -5.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

MORN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-5.83% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDS($8.26B) has a higher market cap than MORN($7.42B). MORN has higher P/E ratio than FDS: MORN (20.52) vs FDS (14.16). MORN YTD gains are higher at: -16.798 vs. FDS (-23.285). FDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 984M vs. MORN (742M). MORN has less debt than FDS: MORN (1.04B) vs FDS (1.56B). MORN (2.4B) and FDS (2.36B) have equivalent revenues.
FDSMORNFDS / MORN
Capitalization8.26B7.42B111%
EBITDA984M742M133%
Gain YTD-23.285-16.798139%
P/E Ratio14.1620.5269%
Revenue2.36B2.4B99%
Total Cash293MN/A-
Total Debt1.56B1.04B150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MORN: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MORN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
3338
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6580
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDS's Valuation (28) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (33). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (100). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's SMR Rating (33) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (38). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MORN (80). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MORN’s over the last 12 months.

MORN's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (96). This means that MORN’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMORN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MORN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLDGX15.24N/A
N/A
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Retail
FBAFX38.42-0.16
-0.41%
American Funds American Balanced 529-F-2
AASOX19.00-0.08
-0.42%
Alger Small Cap Growth I-2
PWCIX87.15-0.64
-0.73%
Principal Capital Appreciation Inst
RYVLX665.02-21.63
-3.15%
Rydex NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy A

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been closely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
-10.51%
MORN - FDS
66%
Closely correlated
-9.03%
MCO - FDS
62%
Loosely correlated
-8.90%
SPGI - FDS
61%
Loosely correlated
-11.27%
NDAQ - FDS
57%
Loosely correlated
-9.40%
MSCI - FDS
53%
Loosely correlated
-6.93%
More

MORN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MORN has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MORN jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MORN
1D Price
Change %
MORN100%
-9.03%
MCO - MORN
74%
Closely correlated
-8.90%
NDAQ - MORN
68%
Closely correlated
-9.40%
SPGI - MORN
68%
Closely correlated
-11.27%
MSCI - MORN
66%
Loosely correlated
-6.93%
JEF - MORN
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More