It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -0.62% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.60%.
FDS is expected to report earnings on Sep 18, 2025.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
FDS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FDS | HAPI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago52% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 1 day ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago57% | 2 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% | 4 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago88% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TIREX | 18.19 | 0.16 | +0.89% |
Nuveen Real Estate Sec Sel R6 | |||
CAAPX | 42.67 | 0.19 | +0.45% |
Ariel Appreciation Investor | |||
VETAX | 47.12 | 0.07 | +0.15% |
Victory Sycamore Established Value A | |||
MVGJX | 18.44 | 0.02 | +0.11% |
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity R1 | |||
GREUX | 11.93 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities R6 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FDS | 100% | +0.41% | ||
MORN - FDS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
MCO - FDS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
SPGI - FDS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
NDAQ - FDS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
MSCI - FDS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HAPI and MAR have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAPI and MAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HAPI | 100% | N/A | ||
MAR - HAPI | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
TEAM - HAPI | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
AMZN - HAPI | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
FDS - HAPI | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
MSFT - HAPI | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
More |