FDRVF
Price
$33.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
739.68M
HLTEF
Price
$71.75
Change
+$7.75 (+12.11%)
Updated
Jun 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDRVF vs HLTEF

Header iconFDRVF vs HLTEF Comparison
Open Charts FDRVF vs HLTEFBanner chart's image
FD Technologies
Price$33.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization739.68M
Hilan Tech
Price$71.75
Change+$7.75 (+12.11%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.96B
FDRVF vs HLTEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLTEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDRVF vs. HLTEF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDRVF is a Hold and HLTEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FDRVF: $33.15 vs. HLTEF: $71.75)
Brand notoriety: FDRVF and HLTEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDRVF: 102% vs. HLTEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FDRVF: $739.68M vs. HLTEF: $1.96B
FDRVF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $739.68M. HLTEF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $1.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $271.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDRVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLTEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDRVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLTEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLTEF is a better buy in the long-term than FDRVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDRVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLTEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDRVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HLTEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLTEF is a better buy in the short-term than FDRVF.

Price Growth

FDRVF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLTEF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+2.03% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLTEF($1.96B) has a higher market cap than FDRVF($740M). FDRVF YTD gains are higher at: 38.994 vs. HLTEF (15.726).
FDRVFHLTEFFDRVF / HLTEF
Capitalization740M1.96B38%
EBITDAN/A468M-
Gain YTD38.99415.726248%
P/E RatioN/A22.32-
RevenueN/A2.91B-
Total CashN/A246M-
Total DebtN/A290M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDRVF vs HLTEF: Fundamental Ratings
FDRVF
HLTEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8819
SMR RATING
1..100
8441
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLTEF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDRVF (82). This means that HLTEF’s stock grew significantly faster than FDRVF’s over the last 12 months.

HLTEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDRVF (88). This means that HLTEF’s stock grew significantly faster than FDRVF’s over the last 12 months.

HLTEF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDRVF (84). This means that HLTEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDRVF’s over the last 12 months.

FDRVF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HLTEF (46). This means that FDRVF’s stock grew similarly to HLTEF’s over the last 12 months.

HLTEF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDRVF (96). This means that HLTEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDRVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDRVFHLTEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDRVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLTEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGRAX26.770.34
+1.29%
Allspring Growth A
PEQZX25.260.24
+0.96%
PGIM Jennison Blend Z
DFMGX38.770.35
+0.91%
DF Dent Midcap Growth Institutional
AGCHX18.560.11
+0.60%
American Century Global Small Cap C
VSIIX48.440.24
+0.50%
Vanguard Small Cap Value Index I

FDRVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDRVF and CFTLF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDRVF and CFTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDRVF
1D Price
Change %
FDRVF100%
N/A
CFTLF - FDRVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIPNF - FDRVF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FJTSY - FDRVF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
ISMAY - FDRVF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
SPOFF - FDRVF
3%
Poorly correlated
+7.38%
More

HLTEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLTEF and HUBV have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLTEF and HUBV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLTEF
1D Price
Change %
HLTEF100%
N/A
HUBV - HLTEF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPOFF - HLTEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+7.38%
NOSUF - HLTEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTHGF - HLTEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDRVF - HLTEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More