Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDNRX vs RGEBX
FDNRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDNRX vs RGEBX
Franklin DynaTech R
Price$170.98
Change-$30.93 (-15.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.87B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
FDNRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDNRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDNRX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FDNRX (27.9B). FDNRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDNRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDNRX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) and FDNRX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDNRX (29.61). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDNRX: RGEBX (250) vs FDNRX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. FDNRX (0.35). FDNRX return over 5 years is better than : 18.46 vs. RGEBX (9.88).
| FDNRX | RGEBX | FDNRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.08 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.08 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.155 | -1.057 | 299% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.9B | 336B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | 1.80 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.30 | 41.63 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 9.88 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 321.24 | 110.02 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers