Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDMO vs IWF
FDMO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FDMO vs IWF
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
Price$82.21
Change-$1.95 (-2.32%)
Volume$57K
Net Assets562.66M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$469.92
Change-$10.16 (-2.12%)
Volume$1.12M
Net Assets122.83B
FDMO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDMO vs. IWF commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDMO is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 123B vs. FDMO (563M). FDMO has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: FDMO (21.495) vs IWF (19.903). FDMO was incepted earlier than IWF: FDMO (9 years) vs IWF (25 years). FDMO (0.16) has a lower expense ratio than IWF (0.18). FDMO has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| FDMO | IWF | FDMO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 21.495 | 19.903 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 563M | 123B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.18 | 89% |
| Turnover | 121.00 | 13.00 | 931% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.34 | 233% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDMO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDMO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDMO has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDMO jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDMO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDMO | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| GS - FDMO | 80% Closely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| PH - FDMO | 80% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| ARES - FDMO | 79% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| MS - FDMO | 79% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| AXP - FDMO | 78% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||