FDMIF
Price
$4.17
Change
+$0.13 (+3.22%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MMRGF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.02 (-11.11%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
37.34M
Ad is loading...

FDMIF vs MMRGF

Header iconFDMIF vs MMRGF Comparison
Open Charts FDMIF vs MMRGFBanner chart's image
FOUNDERS METALS
Price$4.17
Change+$0.13 (+3.22%)
Volume$22.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Minaurum Gold
Price$0.16
Change-$0.02 (-11.11%)
Volume$593.18K
Capitalization37.34M
FDMIF vs MMRGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FDMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDMIF vs. MMRGF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDMIF is a Buy and MMRGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FDMIF: $4.17 vs. MMRGF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: FDMIF and MMRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDMIF: 126% vs. MMRGF: 414%
Market capitalization -- FDMIF: $0 vs. MMRGF: $37.34M
FDMIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. MMRGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $37.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDMIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FDMIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FDMIF and MMRGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDMIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMRGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMRGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMRGF is a better buy in the short-term than FDMIF.

Price Growth

FDMIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.02% price change this week, while MMRGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMRGF YTD gains are higher at: 41.115 vs. FDMIF (29.009).
FDMIFMMRGFFDMIF / MMRGF
CapitalizationN/A37.3M-
EBITDAN/A-8.45M-
Gain YTD29.00941.11571%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A2.44M-
Total DebtN/A83.8K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMRGF: Fundamental Ratings
MMRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDMIFMMRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FDMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

FDMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDMIF and SSVRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDMIF and SSVRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDMIF
1D Price
Change %
FDMIF100%
+3.14%
SSVRF - FDMIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
AYASF - FDMIF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.95%
KNTNF - FDMIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
TORXF - FDMIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.86%
MMRGF - FDMIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.85%
More

MMRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMRGF has been loosely correlated with SSVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMRGF jumps, then SSVRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMRGF
1D Price
Change %
MMRGF100%
-7.85%
SSVRF - MMRGF
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
DSVSF - MMRGF
37%
Loosely correlated
-6.59%
KOOYF - MMRGF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
OCGSF - MMRGF
32%
Poorly correlated
-8.32%
ISVLF - MMRGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.15%
More