Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLCX
FDLSX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLCX
Fidelity Select Leisure
Price$20.18
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.41M
Rydex Leisure C
Price$75.60
Change+$0.30 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.1M
FDLSX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Hold and RYLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 587M vs. RYLCX (6.1M). RYLCX pays higher dividends than FDLSX: RYLCX (0.55) vs FDLSX (0.38). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FDLSX (42 years) vs RYLCX (25 years). RYLCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.69). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FDLSX (43.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLCX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. FDLSX (-8.56). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.04 vs. RYLCX (4.04).
| FDLSX | RYLCX | FDLSX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.39 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 2.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.753 | 9.280 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 587M | 6.1M | 9,621% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.55 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.56 | 7.13 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.04 | 53.71 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.04 | 4.04 | 397% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.26 | 54.38 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement