Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Leisure
Price$20.98
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets691.9M
Rydex Leisure H
Price$88.84
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.05M
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a StrongBuy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 692M vs. RYLAX (14M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FDLSX: RYLAX (0.46) vs FDLSX (0.35). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FDLSX (41 years) vs RYLAX (27 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.70). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 263.00 vs. FDLSX (43.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLAX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.67 vs. FDLSX (10.53). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.03 vs. RYLAX (35.52).
| FDLSX | RYLAX | FDLSX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.142 | 10.801 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 692M | 14M | 4,943% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.46 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.53 | 25.67 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.12 | 39.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.03 | 35.52 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.02 | 63.47 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement