Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLSX vs RYLAX
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FDLSX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Leisure
Price$21.44
Change+$0.10 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets690.93M
Rydex Leisure H
Price$90.38
Change+$0.57 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.2M
FDLSX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLSX vs. RYLAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLSX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 691M vs. RYLAX (13.2M). RYLAX pays higher dividends than FDLSX: RYLAX (0.45) vs FDLSX (0.35). FDLSX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FDLSX (41 years) vs RYLAX (27 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.70). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FDLSX (43.00). FDLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FDLSX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDLSX: RYLAX (1000) vs FDLSX (500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.36 vs. FDLSX (12.78). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : 72.26 vs. RYLAX (51.70).
| FDLSX | RYLAX | FDLSX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.382 | 12.721 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 691M | 13.2M | 5,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.78 | 29.36 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.56 | 63.08 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.26 | 51.70 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.78 | 66.16 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement