Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDLS vs VXF
FDLS vs VXF Comparison
Open Charts FDLS vs VXF
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
Price$37.17
Change+$0.67 (+1.84%)
Volume$11.62K
Net Assets123.56M
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
Price$217.28
Change+$1.86 (+0.86%)
Volume$521.6K
Net Assets83.38B
FDLS vs VXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDLS vs. VXF commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLS is a Buy and VXF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VXF has more net assets: 83.4B vs. FDLS (124M). FDLS has a higher annual dividend yield than VXF: FDLS (27.032) vs VXF (14.615). FDLS was incepted earlier than VXF: FDLS (3 years) vs VXF (24 years). VXF (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than FDLS (0.69). FDLS has a higher turnover VXF (11.00) vs VXF (11.00).
| FDLS | VXF | FDLS / VXF | |
| Gain YTD | 27.032 | 14.615 | 185% |
| Net Assets | 124M | 83.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.05 | 1,380% |
| Turnover | 232.00 | 11.00 | 2,109% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDLS | VXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDLS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDLS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDLS | 100% | +1.84% | ||
| SF - FDLS | 73% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| CAT - FDLS | 71% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| IR - FDLS | 70% Closely correlated | +3.04% | ||
| EWBC - FDLS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ENVA - FDLS | 67% Closely correlated | +11.68% | ||
More | ||||
VXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VXF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VXF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VXF | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| APO - VXF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| KKR - VXF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| FERG - VXF | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| XYZ - VXF | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| MRVL - VXF | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.29% | ||
More | ||||