| FDLS | SCHA | FDLS / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 21.871 | 10.318 | 212% |
| Net Assets | 118M | 19.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.04 | 1,725% |
| Turnover | 232.00 | 11.00 | 2,109% |
| Yield | 0.58 | 1.38 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 16 years | - |
| FDLS | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 71% | 14 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RUSC | 31.06 | 0.20 | +0.64% |
| Russell Inv U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | |||
| GSY | 50.25 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF | |||
| APRP | 29.41 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Apr | |||
| FGDL | 56.28 | -0.35 | -0.62% |
| Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | |||
| FTXN | 28.52 | -0.34 | -1.17% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDLS has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDLS jumps, then SF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDLS | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| SF - FDLS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| CAT - FDLS | 71% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| IR - FDLS | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| EWBC - FDLS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ENVA - FDLS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||