Advertisement
FDLS vs RUSHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDLS is a Buy and RUSHA is a Hold.
RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FDLS | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIECX | 46.14 | 0.49 | +1.07% |
| BNY Mellon International Core Equity C | |||
| GSGRX | 48.72 | -0.11 | -0.23% |
| Goldman Sachs Equity Income A | |||
| RMFCX | 60.07 | -0.15 | -0.25% |
| American Funds American Mutual R3 | |||
| FSGAX | 48.69 | -0.14 | -0.29% |
| Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Adv | |||
| FSLCX | 19.16 | -0.12 | -0.62% |
| Fidelity Small Cap Stock | |||
FDLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDLS has been closely correlated with CAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDLS jumps, then CAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDLS | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| CAT - FDLS | 72% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| IR - FDLS | 70% Closely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| EWBC - FDLS | 70% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| RUSHA - FDLS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| VCTR - FDLS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 85% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 70% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| GPI - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||