FDL | SCHD | FDL / SCHD | |
Gain YTD | 5.964 | -0.649 | -918% |
Net Assets | 5.48B | 70.1B | 8% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.06 | 750% |
Turnover | 46.00 | 29.00 | 159% |
Yield | 4.11 | 3.97 | 104% |
Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
FDL | SCHD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 6 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago72% | 25 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDL has been closely correlated with USB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDL jumps, then USB could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD | 100% | -0.44% | ||
APAM - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
BLK - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
HBAN - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
USB - SCHD | 71% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
EWBC - SCHD | 70% Closely correlated | -2.89% | ||
More |