Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDKSX vs FNSFX
FDKSX vs FNSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKSX vs. FNSFX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKSX is a Hold and FNSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 7.73B vs. FDKSX (824M). FNSFX pays higher dividends than FDKSX: FNSFX (1.22) vs FDKSX (0.50). FDKSX was incepted earlier than FNSFX: FDKSX (11 years) vs FNSFX (8 years). FDKSX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FNSFX (0.65). FDKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FNSFX (18.00). FDKSX (0) and FNSFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. FDKSX (12.24). FNSFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.51 vs. FDKSX (28.11).
| FDKSX | FNSFX | FDKSX / FNSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.65 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.65 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.562 | 17.874 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 7.73B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.22 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.24 | 15.38 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.66 | 54.33 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.11 | 37.51 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement