Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDKLX vs RHKTX
FDKLX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDKLX vs. RHKTX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDKLX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 17.4B vs. FDKLX (10B). FDKLX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FDKLX (1.79) vs RHKTX (0.94). FDKLX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FDKLX (11 years) vs RHKTX (10 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FDKLX (0.12). FDKLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). FDKLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHKTX: FDKLX (0) vs RHKTX (250). FDKLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.67 vs. RHKTX (15.45). FDKLX return over 5 years is better than : 65.76 vs. RHKTX (47.56).
| FDKLX | RHKTX | FDKLX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 0.53 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 0.53 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.485 | 12.416 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 17.4B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.94 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.67 | 15.45 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.79 | 38.75 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.76 | 47.56 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers