Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDIF vs IWF
FDIF vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FDIF vs IWF
Fidelity Disruptors ETF
Price$35.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$3.07K
Net Assets99.7M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$467.12
Change+$2.35 (+0.51%)
Volume$3.09M
Net Assets120.73B
FDIF vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDIF vs. IWF commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDIF is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 121B vs. FDIF (99.7M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than FDIF: IWF (16.667) vs FDIF (12.186). FDIF was incepted earlier than IWF: FDIF (6 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than FDIF (0.50). IWF has a higher turnover FDIF (5.00) vs FDIF (5.00).
| FDIF | IWF | FDIF / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 12.186 | 16.667 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 99.7M | 121B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.18 | 278% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 13.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 0.39 | 0.35 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDIF | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PVAL | 42.47 | 0.22 | +0.52% |
| Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| OSEA | 30.47 | 0.16 | +0.51% |
| Harbor International Compounders ETF | |||
| COWS | 31.16 | 0.10 | +0.33% |
| Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | |||
| FCBD | 25.78 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF | |||
| RMMZ | 14.97 | -0.04 | -0.27% |
| RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II | |||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||