Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDG vs SCHG
FDG vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FDG vs SCHG
American Century Foc Dynmc Gr ETF
Price$103.04
Change-$1.78 (-1.70%)
Volume$6.32K
Net Assets326.48M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$27.89
Change-$0.38 (-1.34%)
Volume$11.84M
Net Assets41.95B
FDG vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDG vs. SCHG commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDG is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 42B vs. FDG (326M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than FDG: SCHG (0.175) vs FDG (-0.790). FDG was incepted earlier than SCHG: FDG (5 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FDG (0.45). FDG has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| FDG | SCHG | FDG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -0.790 | 0.175 | -452% |
| Net Assets | 326M | 42B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 3.00 | 1,500% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 82% | 25 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDG has been closely correlated with ARM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDG jumps, then ARM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDG | 100% | -1.70% | ||
| ARM - FDG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| CDNS - FDG | 67% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| ON - FDG | 66% Closely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| CAVA - FDG | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.70% | ||
| AMZN - FDG | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| COHR - SCHG | 74% Closely correlated | -4.42% | ||
More | ||||