Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDG vs IWF
FDG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FDG vs IWF
American Century Foc Dynmc Gr ETF
Price$115.28
Change-$0.07 (-0.06%)
Volume$25.21K
Net Assets349.92M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$449.01
Change-$1.42 (-0.32%)
Volume$808.05K
Net Assets117.25B
FDG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDG vs. IWF commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDG is a Buy and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 117B vs. FDG (350M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than FDG: IWF (12.394) vs FDG (10.998). FDG was incepted earlier than IWF: FDG (5 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FDG (0.45). FDG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| FDG | IWF | FDG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 10.998 | 12.394 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 350M | 117B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.19 | 237% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 12.00 | 375% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDG | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| NVDA - FDG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| AMZN - FDG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| MSFT - FDG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| META - FDG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ISRG - FDG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||