Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDG vs IWF
FDG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FDG vs IWF
American Century Foc Dynmc Gr ETF
Price$103.04
Change-$1.78 (-1.70%)
Volume$6.32K
Net Assets326.48M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$405.57
Change-$5.20 (-1.27%)
Volume$952.15K
Net Assets107.94B
FDG vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDG vs. IWF commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDG is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 108B vs. FDG (326M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than FDG: IWF (1.102) vs FDG (-0.790). FDG was incepted earlier than IWF: FDG (5 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FDG (0.45). FDG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| FDG | IWF | FDG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | -0.790 | 1.102 | -72% |
| Net Assets | 326M | 108B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.19 | 237% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 12.00 | 375% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 82% | 25 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDG has been closely correlated with ARM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDG jumps, then ARM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDG | 100% | -1.70% | ||
| ARM - FDG | 74% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| CDNS - FDG | 67% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| ON - FDG | 66% Closely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| CAVA - FDG | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.70% | ||
| AMZN - FDG | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 71% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| LRCX - IWF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
More | ||||