Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFF vs XLF
FDFF vs XLF Comparison
Open Charts FDFF vs XLF
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
Price$36.19
Change+$0.14 (+0.39%)
Volume$400
Net Assets48.57M
State Street®FinSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$54.55
Change+$0.39 (+0.72%)
Volume$8.81K
Net Assets53.75B
FDFF vs XLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFF vs. XLF commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFF is a Hold and XLF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLF has more net assets: 53.8B vs. FDFF (48.6M). FDFF has a higher annual dividend yield than XLF: FDFF (1.192) vs XLF (-1.132). FDFF was incepted earlier than XLF: FDFF (6 years) vs XLF (27 years). XLF (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDFF (0.50). FDFF has a higher turnover XLF (6.00) vs XLF (6.00).
| FDFF | XLF | FDFF / XLF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.192 | -1.132 | -105% |
| Net Assets | 48.6M | 53.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.08 | 625% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 6.00 | 367% |
| Yield | 0.86 | 1.31 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDFF | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDFF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDFF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDFF | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| APO - FDFF | 81% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| ARES - FDFF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| BLK - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| MA - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| OWL - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
More | ||||
XLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLF has been closely correlated with JPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLF jumps, then JPM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y