54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFF vs OWL
FDFF vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts FDFF vs OWL
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
Price$36.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.32%)
Volume$4.05K
Net Assets53.66M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$17.79
Change-$0.26 (-1.44%)
Volume$16.05M
Capitalization11.58B
FDFF vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFF vs. OWL commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFF is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDFF | OWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBH | 10.09 | 0.24 | +2.44% |
| Neuberger Berman Municipal Fund | |||
| EVYM | 48.51 | 0.47 | +0.97% |
| Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF | |||
| DFNM | 47.71 | 0.17 | +0.36% |
| Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| MMLG | 35.15 | 0.08 | +0.22% |
| First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF | |||
| BNGE | 38.71 | 0.08 | +0.21% |
| First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF | |||
FDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDFF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDFF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDFF | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| APO - FDFF | 81% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| BLK - FDFF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| OWL - FDFF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| ARES - FDFF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| MA - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
More | ||||
OWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y