Intraday BUY SELL Signals
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFF vs OWL
FDFF vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts FDFF vs OWL
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
Price$36.27
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
Volume$4.97K
Net Assets48.84M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$15.46
Change-$0.22 (-1.40%)
Volume$11.49M
Capitalization10.28B
FDFF vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFF vs. OWL commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFF is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDFF | OWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 21 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BOAT | 32.39 | 0.18 | +0.56% |
| SonicShares™ Global Shipping ETF | |||
| SEIM | 47.05 | 0.11 | +0.23% |
| SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momt Fac ETF | |||
| CORO | 31.10 | 0.06 | +0.19% |
| iShares International Country Rot ActETF | |||
| GMNY | 50.03 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Goldman Sachs Dynamic New Yor Mun IncETF | |||
| TOK | 139.13 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF | |||
FDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDFF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDFF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDFF | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| APO - FDFF | 81% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| ARES - FDFF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| BLK - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| MA - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| OWL - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||
OWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y