Intraday BUY SELL Signals
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFF vs OWL
FDFF vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts FDFF vs OWL
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
Price$33.95
Change+$0.28 (+0.83%)
Volume$100
Net Assets42.06M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$12.05
Change-$0.06 (-0.50%)
Volume$262.48K
Capitalization8.05B
FDFF vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFF vs. OWL commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFF is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDFF | OWL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 20 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LIDFX | 11.39 | 0.09 | +0.80% |
| Lord Abbett International Value F | |||
| HQIIX | 20.73 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| Hartford Equity Income I | |||
| NZDCNY | 4.17 | N/A | N/A |
| New Zealand Dollar - China Yuan | |||
| GSPCX | 11.52 | -0.09 | -0.78% |
| Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C | |||
| TGVVX | 55.15 | -0.95 | -1.69% |
| Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth I | |||
FDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDFF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDFF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDFF | 100% | -3.72% | ||
| APO - FDFF | 81% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
| BLK - FDFF | 77% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| ARES - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -10.15% | ||
| OWL - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -9.76% | ||
| MA - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
OWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y