Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFF vs KCE
FDFF vs KCE Comparison
Open Charts FDFF vs KCE
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
Price$33.95
Change+$0.28 (+0.83%)
Volume$100
Net Assets42.06M
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Cap Mkts ETF
Price$151.19
Change+$1.34 (+0.89%)
Volume$101
Net Assets516.81M
FDFF vs KCE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFF vs. KCE commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFF is a Hold and KCE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KCE has more net assets: 517M vs. FDFF (42.1M). KCE has a higher annual dividend yield than FDFF: KCE (-0.059) vs FDFF (-5.462). FDFF was incepted earlier than KCE: FDFF (6 years) vs KCE (20 years). KCE (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FDFF (0.50). FDFF (22.00) and KCE (22.00) have matching turnover.
| FDFF | KCE | FDFF / KCE | |
| Gain YTD | -5.462 | -0.059 | 9,181% |
| Net Assets | 42.1M | 517M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.35 | 143% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 22.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 0.88 | 1.57 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDFF | KCE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDFF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDFF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDFF | 100% | -3.72% | ||
| APO - FDFF | 81% Closely correlated | -4.76% | ||
| BLK - FDFF | 77% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| ARES - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -10.15% | ||
| OWL - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -9.76% | ||
| MA - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
KCE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KCE has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KCE jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y