Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDFAX vs FDTGX
FDFAX vs FDTGX Comparison
Open Charts FDFAX vs FDTGX
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Port
Price$85.34
Change-$1.18 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.22B
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$82.82
Change-$1.15 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.22B
FDFAX vs FDTGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDFAX vs. FDTGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDFAX is a Buy and FDTGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDFAX (1.22B) and FDTGX (1.22B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDFAX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: FDFAX (1.91) vs FDTGX (1.43). FDFAX was incepted earlier than FDTGX: FDFAX (40 years) vs FDTGX (19 years). FDTGX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FDFAX (0.68). FDFAX (45.00) and FDTGX (45.00) have comparable annual turnover. FDFAX (0) and FDTGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDFAX (500) and FDTGX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.59 vs. FDTGX (-7.28). FDFAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.56 vs. FDTGX (14.75).
| FDFAX | FDTGX | FDFAX / FDTGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.22 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.22 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.414 | -4.683 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 1.22B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.43 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.59 | -7.28 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.85 | 2.86 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.56 | 14.75 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.27 | -4.22 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement