26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDEM vs VIPS
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison
Open Charts FDEM vs VIPS
Fidelity Emerging Markets Mltfct ETF
Price$30.56
Change+$0.16 (+0.53%)
Volume$48.19K
Net Assets246.01M
Vipshop Holdings
Price$18.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Volume$2.6M
Capitalization9.27B
FDEM vs VIPS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEM vs. VIPS commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEM is a Hold and VIPS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VIPS: Fundamental Ratings
VIPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEM | VIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 9 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEM | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| ATHM - FDEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| PDD - FDEM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| QFIN - FDEM | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| VIPS - FDEM | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| YUMC - FDEM | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
More | ||||
VIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIPS has been loosely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIPS jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPS | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| JD - VIPS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BABA - VIPS | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| PDD - VIPS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| MPNGY - VIPS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BABAF - VIPS | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
More | ||||