FDCHF
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.04 (-2.55%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
225.69M
LZRFY
Price
$7.75
Change
-$0.08 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
15.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDCHF vs LZRFY

Header iconFDCHF vs LZRFY Comparison
Open Charts FDCHF vs LZRFYBanner chart's image
Funding Circle
Price$1.53
Change-$0.04 (-2.55%)
Volume$23.08K
Capitalization225.69M
Localiza Rent A Car SA
Price$7.75
Change-$0.08 (-1.02%)
Volume$778
Capitalization15.01B
FDCHF vs LZRFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
LZRFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDCHF vs. LZRFY commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCHF is a Hold and LZRFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FDCHF: $1.57 vs. LZRFY: $7.44)
Brand notoriety: FDCHF and LZRFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDCHF: 100% vs. LZRFY: 2%
Market capitalization -- FDCHF: $225.69M vs. LZRFY: $15.01B
FDCHF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $225.69M. LZRFY’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $15.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDCHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLZRFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDCHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LZRFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LZRFY is a better buy in the long-term than FDCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZRFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LZRFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FDCHF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LZRFY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +4.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZRFY($15B) has a higher market cap than FDCHF($226M). LZRFY has higher P/E ratio than FDCHF: LZRFY (34.25) vs FDCHF (6.84). LZRFY YTD gains are higher at: 37.196 vs. FDCHF (0.000). LZRFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.92B vs. FDCHF (43.8M). LZRFY has higher revenues than FDCHF: LZRFY (21.9B) vs FDCHF (172M).
FDCHFLZRFYFDCHF / LZRFY
Capitalization226M15B2%
EBITDA43.8M8.92B0%
Gain YTD0.00037.196-
P/E Ratio6.8434.2520%
Revenue172M21.9B1%
Total Cash183MN/A-
Total Debt114MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDCHF vs LZRFY: Fundamental Ratings
FDCHF
LZRFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4862
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5279
SMR RATING
1..100
6179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LZRFY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCHF (57). This means that LZRFY’s stock grew similarly to FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as LZRFY (79). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew similarly to LZRFY’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as LZRFY (79). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew similarly to LZRFY’s over the last 12 months.

LZRFY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCHF (47). This means that LZRFY’s stock grew similarly to FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

LZRFY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCHF (51). This means that LZRFY’s stock grew similarly to FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZRFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZRFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FDCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCHF has been loosely correlated with AEOJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDCHF jumps, then AEOJF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCHF
1D Price
Change %
FDCHF100%
N/A
AEOJF - FDCHF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DWAY - FDCHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNMA - FDCHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
FMCC - FDCHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
LZRFY - FDCHF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
More

LZRFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LZRFY and AER have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LZRFY and AER's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZRFY
1D Price
Change %
LZRFY100%
-1.60%
AER - LZRFY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
TBCRF - LZRFY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AL - LZRFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
MAMTF - LZRFY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTHY - LZRFY
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.68%
More