Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs XLC
FDCF vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs XLC
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$47.11
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
Volume$304
Net Assets103.67M
State Street® CommServSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$115.11
Change-$0.12 (-0.10%)
Volume$63.63K
Net Assets26.13B
FDCF vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. XLC commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 26.1B vs. FDCF (104M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FDCF (25.029) vs XLC (20.075). FDCF was incepted earlier than XLC: FDCF (6 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). XLC has a higher turnover FDCF (23.00) vs FDCF (23.00).
| FDCF | XLC | FDCF / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 25.029 | 20.075 | 125% |
| Net Assets | 104M | 26.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.08 | 625% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 25.00 | 92% |
| Yield | 0.03 | 1.05 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 72% | 14 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| META - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 70% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| LYV - XLC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
More | ||||