Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs XLC
FDCF vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs XLC
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$48.57
Change+$0.33 (+0.68%)
Volume$125
Net Assets106.35M
State Street® CommServSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$116.64
Change-$0.25 (-0.21%)
Volume$5.65M
Net Assets26.8B
FDCF vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. XLC commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 26.8B vs. FDCF (106M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FDCF (0.339) vs XLC (-0.917). FDCF was incepted earlier than XLC: FDCF (6 years) vs XLC (8 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). XLC has a higher turnover FDCF (23.00) vs FDCF (23.00).
| FDCF | XLC | FDCF / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 0.339 | -0.917 | -37% |
| Net Assets | 106M | 26.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.08 | 625% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 40.00 | 58% |
| Yield | 0.03 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| META - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 67% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| LYV - XLC | 67% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||