Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs SOCL
FDCF vs SOCL Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs SOCL
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$49.30
Change+$0.12 (+0.24%)
Volume$13.46K
Net Assets103.79M
Global X Social Media ETF
Price$60.24
Change-$0.24 (-0.40%)
Volume$8.32K
Net Assets161.46M
FDCF vs SOCL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. SOCL commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and SOCL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOCL has more net assets: 161M vs. FDCF (104M). SOCL has a higher annual dividend yield than FDCF: SOCL (42.642) vs FDCF (30.566). FDCF was incepted earlier than SOCL: FDCF (5 years) vs SOCL (14 years). FDCF (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than SOCL (0.65). FDCF has a higher turnover SOCL (16.85) vs SOCL (16.85).
| FDCF | SOCL | FDCF / SOCL | |
| Gain YTD | 30.566 | 42.642 | 72% |
| Net Assets | 104M | 161M | 65% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 16.85 | 136% |
| Yield | 0.03 | 0.19 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | SOCL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| META - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 70% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
SOCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOCL has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOCL jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCL | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| META - SOCL | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| BIDU - SOCL | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| BILI - SOCL | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| TME - SOCL | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| WB - SOCL | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||