Intraday BUY SELL Signals
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs META
FDCF vs META Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs META
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$48.23
Change+$0.15 (+0.31%)
Volume$7.56K
Net Assets106.4M
Meta Platforms
Price$667.55
Change+$2.61 (+0.39%)
Volume$5.63M
Capitalization1.68T
FDCF vs META Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. META commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Buy and META is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
META: Fundamental Ratings
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| META - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| DASH - META | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| RDDT - META | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| THRY - META | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| OPRA - META | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| PINS - META | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
More | ||||