Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs IYZ
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs IYZ
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$41.22
Change-$0.36 (-0.87%)
Volume$10.22K
Net Assets70.18M
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
Price$28.22
Change-$0.40 (-1.40%)
Volume$1.14M
Net Assets382.32M
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. IYZ commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and IYZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYZ has more net assets: 382M vs. FDCF (70.2M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than IYZ: FDCF (9.130) vs IYZ (5.841). FDCF was incepted earlier than IYZ: FDCF (5 years) vs IYZ (25 years). IYZ (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover IYZ (30.00) vs IYZ (30.00).
| FDCF | IYZ | FDCF / IYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 9.130 | 5.841 | 156% |
| Net Assets | 70.2M | 382M | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.40 | 125% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 30.00 | 117% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 1.94 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 28 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 25 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
More | ||||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been closely correlated with LITE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then LITE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | -1.40% | ||
| LITE - IYZ | 67% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| CMCSA - IYZ | 66% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| CIEN - IYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| CHTR - IYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| UI - IYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.78% | ||
More | ||||