Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs IYZ
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs IYZ
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$44.35
Change+$0.30 (+0.68%)
Volume$9.76K
Net Assets75.58M
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
Price$29.87
Change+$0.23 (+0.78%)
Volume$405.72K
Net Assets545.49M
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. IYZ commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and IYZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYZ has more net assets: 545M vs. FDCF (75.6M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than IYZ: FDCF (17.462) vs IYZ (12.517). FDCF was incepted earlier than IYZ: FDCF (5 years) vs IYZ (25 years). IYZ (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover IYZ (30.00) vs IYZ (30.00).
| FDCF | IYZ | FDCF / IYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 17.462 | 12.517 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 75.6M | 545M | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.40 | 125% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 30.00 | 117% |
| Yield | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
More | ||||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been closely correlated with LITE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then LITE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| LITE - IYZ | 67% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| CMCSA - IYZ | 66% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| CIEN - IYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| CHTR - IYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| UI - IYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.98% | ||
More | ||||