Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs IYZ
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs IYZ
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$45.18
Change-$0.21 (-0.46%)
Volume$5.17K
Net Assets81.46M
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
Price$29.97
Change-$0.30 (-0.99%)
Volume$275.5K
Net Assets584.19M
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. IYZ commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and IYZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYZ has more net assets: 584M vs. FDCF (81.5M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than IYZ: FDCF (19.653) vs IYZ (12.894). FDCF was incepted earlier than IYZ: FDCF (5 years) vs IYZ (25 years). IYZ (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover IYZ (30.00) vs IYZ (30.00).
| FDCF | IYZ | FDCF / IYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 19.653 | 12.894 | 152% |
| Net Assets | 81.5M | 584M | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.40 | 125% |
| Turnover | 35.00 | 30.00 | 117% |
| Yield | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TEEFX | 82.78 | 0.37 | +0.45% |
| T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Equity I | |||
| WWMCX | 11.80 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
| Westwood Quality Midcap Institutional | |||
| FEYCX | 28.50 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% C | |||
| MSQLX | 11.57 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq L | |||
| GQFPX | 12.26 | -0.01 | -0.08% |
| GQG Partners Global Quality Value Fd Inv | |||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| META - FDCF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.66% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been closely correlated with LITE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then LITE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| LITE - IYZ | 66% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| CMCSA - IYZ | 66% Closely correlated | -4.78% | ||
| CIEN - IYZ | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| ANET - IYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| UI - IYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||