Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCF vs IYZ
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs IYZ
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$47.14
Change-$0.08 (-0.17%)
Volume$10.17K
Net Assets104.04M
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
Price$32.45
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.55M
Net Assets618.2M
FDCF vs IYZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. IYZ commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a Hold and IYZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYZ has more net assets: 618M vs. FDCF (104M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than IYZ: FDCF (25.029) vs IYZ (22.862). FDCF was incepted earlier than IYZ: FDCF (6 years) vs IYZ (26 years). IYZ (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover IYZ (8.00) vs IYZ (8.00).
| FDCF | IYZ | FDCF / IYZ | |
| Gain YTD | 25.029 | 22.862 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 104M | 618M | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.38 | 132% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 8.00 | 288% |
| Yield | 0.03 | 1.89 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | IYZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 72% | 15 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| META - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||
IYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYZ has been loosely correlated with CIEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IYZ jumps, then CIEN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYZ | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| CIEN - IYZ | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| LITE - IYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.62% | ||
| ANET - IYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| UI - IYZ | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| LBRDA - IYZ | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||