Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCAX vs RGAGX
FDCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FDCAX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation
Price$46.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.81B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
FDCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FDCAX (6.81B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FDCAX: RGAGX (0.61) vs FDCAX (0.21). FDCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FDCAX (39 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FDCAX (0.56) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FDCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FDCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FDCAX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. FDCAX (0.52). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. FDCAX (24.85).
| FDCAX | RGAGX | FDCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.30 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.30 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.153 | 13.508 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 328B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.61 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.52 | 18.20 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.97 | 59.73 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.85 | 50.83 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.76 | 89.40 | 24% |