Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDCAX vs RGAGX
FDCAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FDCAX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation
Price$46.67
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.92B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.56
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.93B
FDCAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FDCAX (6.92B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FDCAX: RGAGX (0.60) vs FDCAX (0.20). FDCAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FDCAX (39 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FDCAX (0.56) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FDCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FDCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FDCAX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. FDCAX (-1.10). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.07 vs. FDCAX (19.12).
| FDCAX | RGAGX | FDCAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.30 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.30 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.553 | 14.769 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.92B | 329B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.60 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.10 | 15.45 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.20 | 48.20 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.12 | 45.07 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.15 | 103.06 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement