Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDBTX vs FJAPX
FDBTX vs FJAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDBTX vs. FJAPX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDBTX is a Hold and FJAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.78B vs. FJAPX (339M). FDBTX pays higher dividends than FJAPX: FDBTX (3.09) vs FJAPX (2.58). FDBTX was incepted earlier than FJAPX: FDBTX (8 years) vs FJAPX (7 years). FJAPX (0.32) is less costly to investors than FDBTX (0.30). FJAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. FDBTX (6.00). FJAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDBTX: FJAPX (0) vs FDBTX (1000000). FDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.89 vs. FJAPX (7.11). FDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.68 vs. FJAPX (15.65).
| FDBTX | FJAPX | FDBTX / FJAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.32 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.32 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.810 | 4.686 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 339M | 1,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 2.58 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 7.11 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.86 | 23.62 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.68 | 15.65 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |