Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDAGX vs FDCGX
FDAGX vs FDCGX Comparison
Open Charts FDAGX vs FDCGX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples A
Price$87.78
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples C
Price$84.57
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
FDAGX vs FDCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDAGX vs. FDCGX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDAGX is a Buy and FDCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDAGX (1.14B) and FDCGX (1.14B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDAGX pays higher dividends than FDCGX: FDAGX (1.65) vs FDCGX (0.92). FDAGX was incepted earlier than FDCGX: FDAGX (19 years) vs FDCGX (19 years). FDCGX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FDAGX (0.97). FDAGX (45.00) and FDCGX (45.00) have comparable annual turnover. FDAGX (0) and FDCGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDAGX (500) and FDCGX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FDAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.45 vs. FDCGX (-7.38). FDAGX return over 5 years is better than : 8.96 vs. FDCGX (4.27).
| FDAGX | FDCGX | FDAGX / FDCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.72 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.72 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.099 | -0.411 | -24% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 1.14B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.92 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | -7.38 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.31 | -5.81 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.96 | 4.27 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.60 | -2.72 | -96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement