Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCVCX vs SSGSX
FCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FCVCX vs SSGSX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value C
Price$16.43
Change+$0.11 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.42B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
FCVCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCVCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCVCX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. FCVCX (4.42B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than FCVCX: SSGSX (0.51) vs FCVCX (0.15). FCVCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FCVCX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). FCVCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). FCVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). FCVCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: FCVCX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). FCVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.99 vs. SSGSX (-8.77). FCVCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.69 vs. SSGSX (23.49).
| FCVCX | SSGSX | FCVCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.26 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.26 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.050 | -2.283 | -90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.42B | 5.73B | 77% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.51 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.99 | -8.77 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.94 | -2.14 | -231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.69 | 23.49 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.42 | 18.39 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement