Advertisement
FCUV vs WRAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUV is a Hold and WRAP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCUV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWRAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FCUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WRAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCUV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FCUV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- WRAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FCUV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -14.49% price change this week, while WRAP (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -26.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
FCUV is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
WRAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-4.24% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| FCUV | WRAP | FCUV / WRAP | |
| Capitalization | 5.48M | 94.6M | 6% |
| EBITDA | -5.87M | -13.54M | 43% |
| Gain YTD | -17.664 | -23.109 | 76% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 387K | 4.13M | 9% |
| Total Cash | 454K | 5.97M | 8% |
| Total Debt | 20.5K | 2.49M | 1% |
FCUV | WRAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WRAP's Valuation (49) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FCUV (72) in the null industry. This means that WRAP’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
WRAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FCUV (100) in the null industry. This means that WRAP’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
WRAP's SMR Rating (99) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FCUV (100) in the null industry. This means that WRAP’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
WRAP's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (96) in the null industry. This means that WRAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
WRAP's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FCUV (100) in the null industry. This means that WRAP’s stock grew similarly to FCUV’s over the last 12 months.
| FCUV | WRAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
FCUV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUV has been loosely correlated with ASTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUV jumps, then ASTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUV | 100% | -10.83% | ||
| ASTC - FCUV | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| AIMD - FCUV | 44% Loosely correlated | -5.56% | ||
| SOBR - FCUV | 42% Loosely correlated | -9.89% | ||
| ARBE - FCUV | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.13% | ||
| MVIS - FCUV | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
More | ||||
WRAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRAP has been loosely correlated with FCUV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRAP jumps, then FCUV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WRAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRAP | 100% | -9.85% | ||
| FCUV - WRAP | 38% Loosely correlated | -10.83% | ||
| SOBR - WRAP | 32% Poorly correlated | -9.89% | ||
| AIMD - WRAP | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.56% | ||
| MVIS - WRAP | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KEYS - WRAP | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||