FCUV
Price
$2.13
Change
-$0.03 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.93M
86 days until earnings call
HRIBF
Price
$74.00
Change
-$2.87 (-3.73%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCUV vs HRIBF

Header iconFCUV vs HRIBF Comparison
Open Charts FCUV vs HRIBFBanner chart's image
Focus Universal
Price$2.13
Change-$0.03 (-1.39%)
Volume$195
Capitalization15.93M
Horiba
Price$74.00
Change-$2.87 (-3.73%)
Volume$250
Capitalization3.34B
FCUV vs HRIBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCUV vs. HRIBF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUV is a Buy and HRIBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FCUV: $2.16 vs. HRIBF: $74.00)
Brand notoriety: FCUV and HRIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCUV: 48% vs. HRIBF: 91%
Market capitalization -- FCUV: $15.93M vs. HRIBF: $3.34B
FCUV [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $15.93M. HRIBF’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $3.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $92.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCUV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHRIBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HRIBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRIBF is a better buy in the long-term than FCUV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCUV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRIBF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCUV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HRIBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCUV is a better buy in the short-term than HRIBF.

Price Growth

FCUV (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а +12.30% price change this week, while HRIBF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -3.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCUV is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+2.04% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRIBF($3.34B) has a higher market cap than FCUV($15.9M). HRIBF YTD gains are higher at: 27.092 vs. FCUV (-38.397). HRIBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 66B vs. FCUV (-3.24M). HRIBF has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FCUV (1.15M). FCUV has less debt than HRIBF: FCUV (32.2K) vs HRIBF (64.1B). HRIBF has higher revenues than FCUV: HRIBF (324B) vs FCUV (433K).
FCUVHRIBFFCUV / HRIBF
Capitalization15.9M3.34B0%
EBITDA-3.24M66B-0%
Gain YTD-38.39727.092-142%
P/E RatioN/A12.73-
Revenue433K324B0%
Total Cash1.15M153B0%
Total Debt32.2K64.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCUV vs HRIBF: Fundamental Ratings
FCUV
HRIBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
10011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10038
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HRIBF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (67). This means that HRIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

HRIBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100). This means that HRIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

HRIBF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCUV (100). This means that HRIBF’s stock grew significantly faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

HRIBF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (91). This means that HRIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

HRIBF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCUV (100). This means that HRIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCUVHRIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCUV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGYCX21.670.57
+2.70%
American Century Global Gold C
RLBAX37.590.20
+0.53%
American Funds American Balanced R1
IYMIX31.480.05
+0.16%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth I
HLFMX9.140.01
+0.11%
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst
DGEFX14.12N/A
N/A
Destinations Equity Income I

FCUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUV and MVIS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUV and MVIS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCUV
1D Price
Change %
FCUV100%
-1.10%
MVIS - FCUV
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
SOTK - FCUV
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.10%
WATT - FCUV
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
KEYS - FCUV
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
BKSY - FCUV
19%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
More

HRIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRIBF has been loosely correlated with CODAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRIBF jumps, then CODAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRIBF
1D Price
Change %
HRIBF100%
N/A
CODAF - HRIBF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HXGBY - HRIBF
12%
Poorly correlated
+8.51%
KYCCF - HRIBF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
KRKNF - HRIBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
FCUV - HRIBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More