Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs VOT
FCUS vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs VOT
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$32.35
Change-$0.42 (-1.28%)
Volume$5.36K
Net Assets45.83M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$289.01
Change-$0.13 (-0.04%)
Volume$116.55K
Net Assets33.08B
FCUS vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. VOT commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and VOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 33.1B vs. FCUS (45.8M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than FCUS: VOT (13.992) vs FCUS (12.451). FCUS was incepted earlier than VOT: FCUS (3 years) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| FCUS | VOT | FCUS / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 12.451 | 13.992 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 45.8M | 33.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.07 | 1,129% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 21.00 | 2,348% |
| Yield | 9.50 | 0.62 | 1,535% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| KKR - FCUS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CARR - FCUS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| AFRM - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| CZR - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| APO - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| CPAY - VOT | 77% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||