Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs MDYG
FCUS vs MDYG Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs MDYG
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$32.35
Change-$0.42 (-1.28%)
Volume$5.36K
Net Assets45.83M
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$90.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.04%)
Volume$52.06K
Net Assets2.39B
FCUS vs MDYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. MDYG commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and MDYG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.39B vs. FCUS (45.8M). FCUS has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: FCUS (12.451) vs MDYG (4.554). FCUS was incepted earlier than MDYG: FCUS (3 years) vs MDYG (20 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover MDYG (41.00) vs MDYG (41.00).
| FCUS | MDYG | FCUS / MDYG | |
| Gain YTD | 12.451 | 4.554 | 273% |
| Net Assets | 45.8M | 2.39B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.15 | 527% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 41.00 | 1,202% |
| Yield | 9.50 | 0.78 | 1,216% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 9 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been loosely correlated with IBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then IBP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| KKR - FCUS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| CARR - FCUS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| AFRM - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| CZR - FCUS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 86% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
More | ||||