Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs MDYG
FCUS vs MDYG Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs MDYG
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$30.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.39%)
Volume$200
Net Assets44.39M
SPDR® S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
Price$91.64
Change+$0.93 (+1.03%)
Volume$200
Net Assets2.41B
FCUS vs MDYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. MDYG commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and MDYG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.41B vs. FCUS (44.4M). FCUS has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: FCUS (6.455) vs MDYG (6.082). FCUS was incepted earlier than MDYG: FCUS (3 years) vs MDYG (20 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover MDYG (51.00) vs MDYG (51.00).
| FCUS | MDYG | FCUS / MDYG | |
| Gain YTD | 6.455 | 6.082 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 44.4M | 2.41B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.15 | 527% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 51.00 | 967% |
| Yield | 11.02 | 0.82 | 1,341% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 19 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUS and GAP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUS and GAP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | -1.69% | ||
| GAP - FCUS | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.02% | ||
| MSTR - FCUS | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.99% | ||
| UPST - FCUS | 17% Poorly correlated | -6.07% | ||
| CRDO - FCUS | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
| IBKR - FCUS | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 86% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| JHG - MDYG | 86% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
More | ||||