Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs MDYG
FCUS vs MDYG Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs MDYG
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$31.63
Change-$2.39 (-7.03%)
Volume$265.83K
Net Assets56.14M
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF
Price$90.25
Change-$2.16 (-2.34%)
Volume$78.98K
Net Assets2.37B
FCUS vs MDYG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. MDYG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and MDYG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDYG has more net assets: 2.37B vs. FCUS (56.1M). FCUS has a higher annual dividend yield than MDYG: FCUS (18.264) vs MDYG (6.973). FCUS was incepted earlier than MDYG: FCUS (3 years) vs MDYG (20 years). MDYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover MDYG (41.00) vs MDYG (41.00).
| FCUS | MDYG | FCUS / MDYG | |
| Gain YTD | 18.264 | 6.973 | 262% |
| Net Assets | 56.1M | 2.37B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.15 | 527% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 41.00 | 1,202% |
| Yield | 8.64 | 0.78 | 1,110% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 20 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| GEV - FCUS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| IBP - FCUS | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| KKR - FCUS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| RDDT - FCUS | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| CARR - FCUS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
More | ||||
MDYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDYG has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDYG jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDYG | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| EVR - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| BDC - MDYG | 85% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| FLS - MDYG | 84% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| CG - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| SF - MDYG | 83% Closely correlated | +2.07% | ||
More | ||||