Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs IWP
FCUS vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs IWP
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$27.24
Change-$0.25 (-0.91%)
Volume$600
Net Assets39.53M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$139.86
Change+$0.08 (+0.06%)
Volume$927.54K
Net Assets19.96B
FCUS vs IWP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. IWP commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 20B vs. FCUS (39.5M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than FCUS: IWP (10.481) vs FCUS (-4.450). FCUS was incepted earlier than IWP: FCUS (3 years) vs IWP (24 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover IWP (24.00) vs IWP (24.00).
| FCUS | IWP | FCUS / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | -4.450 | 10.481 | -42% |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 20B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.23 | 343% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 24.00 | 2,054% |
| Yield | 10.99 | 0.37 | 3,006% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUS and GAP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUS and GAP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| GAP - FCUS | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
| MSTR - FCUS | 19% Poorly correlated | -4.35% | ||
| IBKR - FCUS | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| UPST - FCUS | 15% Poorly correlated | -4.49% | ||
| CRDO - FCUS | 15% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y