Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs IWP
FCUS vs IWP Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs IWP
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$30.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.39%)
Volume$200
Net Assets44.39M
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$142.50
Change+$1.22 (+0.86%)
Volume$4.78K
Net Assets20.55B
FCUS vs IWP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. IWP commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 20.5B vs. FCUS (44.4M). IWP has a higher annual dividend yield than FCUS: IWP (11.759) vs FCUS (6.455). FCUS was incepted earlier than IWP: FCUS (3 years) vs IWP (24 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover IWP (24.00) vs IWP (24.00).
| FCUS | IWP | FCUS / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | 6.455 | 11.759 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 44.4M | 20.5B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.23 | 343% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 24.00 | 2,054% |
| Yield | 11.02 | 0.36 | 3,045% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUS and GAP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUS and GAP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | -1.69% | ||
| GAP - FCUS | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.02% | ||
| MSTR - FCUS | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.99% | ||
| UPST - FCUS | 17% Poorly correlated | -6.07% | ||
| CRDO - FCUS | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
| IBKR - FCUS | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||
IWP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y