Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUS vs IMCG
FCUS vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts FCUS vs IMCG
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
Price$25.87
Change+$0.36 (+1.41%)
Volume$515
Net Assets38.83M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$81.29
Change+$0.83 (+1.03%)
Volume$51.64K
Net Assets2.84B
FCUS vs IMCG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUS vs. IMCG commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUS is a Hold and IMCG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.84B vs. FCUS (38.8M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than FCUS: IMCG (7.995) vs FCUS (-10.086). FCUS was incepted earlier than IMCG: FCUS (3 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FCUS (0.79). FCUS has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| FCUS | IMCG | FCUS / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | -10.086 | 7.995 | -126% |
| Net Assets | 38.8M | 2.84B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.06 | 1,317% |
| Turnover | 493.00 | 43.00 | 1,147% |
| Yield | 11.72 | 0.75 | 1,556% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCUS | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCUS has been closely correlated with VRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCUS jumps, then VRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCUS | 100% | +1.39% | ||
| VRT - FCUS | 72% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| GEV - FCUS | 72% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| EME - FCUS | 71% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| VST - FCUS | 70% Closely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| IBKR - FCUS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||