FCUL
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
109.37K
GENK
Price
$2.93
Change
-$0.09 (-2.98%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCUL vs GENK

Header iconFCUL vs GENK Comparison
Open Charts FCUL vs GENKBanner chart's image
Food Culture
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.01K
Capitalization109.37K
GEN Restaurant Group
Price$2.93
Change-$0.09 (-2.98%)
Volume$202.12K
Capitalization15.38M
FCUL vs GENK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCUL vs. GENK commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUL is a Hold and GENK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FCUL: $0.06 vs. GENK: $2.93)
Brand notoriety: FCUL and GENK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCUL: 143% vs. GENK: 268%
Market capitalization -- FCUL: $109.37K vs. GENK: $15.38M
FCUL [@Restaurants] is valued at $109.37K. GENK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $15.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGENK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GENK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCUL and GENK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCUL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GENK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCUL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GENK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GENK is a better buy in the short-term than FCUL.

Price Growth

FCUL (@Restaurants) experienced а +46.34% price change this week, while GENK (@Restaurants) price change was -6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GENK($15.4M) has a higher market cap than FCUL($109K). GENK YTD gains are higher at: -60.550 vs. FCUL (-72.727).
FCULGENKFCUL / GENK
Capitalization109K15.4M1%
EBITDAN/A9.76M-
Gain YTD-72.727-60.550120%
P/E RatioN/A31.15-
RevenueN/A216M-
Total CashN/A9.61M-
Total DebtN/A174M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCUL: Fundamental Ratings
FCUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCULGENK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BFRG1.450.08
+5.84%
Bullfrog AI Holdings
MB9.550.22
+2.36%
Masterbeef Group
JBSS63.440.04
+0.06%
John B Sanfilippo & Son
TEX51.78-0.05
-0.10%
Terex Corp
AFRM81.53-1.20
-1.45%
Affirm Holdings

FCUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCUL and CHSN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCUL and CHSN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCUL
1D Price
Change %
FCUL100%
N/A
CHSN - FCUL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
GENK - FCUL
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
CAVA - FCUL
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
THCH - FCUL
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
GGGSY - FCUL
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More

GENK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GENK has been loosely correlated with FAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GENK jumps, then FAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GENK
1D Price
Change %
GENK100%
-2.82%
FAT - GENK
35%
Loosely correlated
-11.74%
SHAK - GENK
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
CAKE - GENK
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
CNNE - GENK
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
SBUX - GENK
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
More