Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCUEX vs VTSMX
FCUEX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts FCUEX vs VTSMX
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity
Price$20.72
Change+$0.15 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets589.83M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$155.90
Change+$0.40 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
FCUEX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCUEX vs. VTSMX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCUEX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. FCUEX (590M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than FCUEX: VTSMX (1.07) vs FCUEX (0.31). FCUEX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: FCUEX (6 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). FCUEX (0.90) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). FCUEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). VTSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCUEX: VTSMX (3000) vs FCUEX (15000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.03 vs. FCUEX (7.98). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 84.94 vs. FCUEX (71.68).
| FCUEX | VTSMX | FCUEX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.14 | 643% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.14 | 643% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.320 | 10.330 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 3000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 1.95T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.07 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 18.03 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 63.63 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.68 | 84.94 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 224.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement