57 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCTR vs ZM
FCTR vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts FCTR vs ZM
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
Price$35.15
Change+$0.34 (+0.98%)
Volume$4.13K
Net Assets58.06M
Zoom Communications
Price$84.51
Change+$0.52 (+0.62%)
Volume$2.34M
Capitalization25.29B
FCTR vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTR vs. ZM commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTR is a Hold and ZM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZM: Fundamental Ratings
ZM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCTR | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 6 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCTR has been loosely correlated with V. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCTR jumps, then V could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCTR | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| V - FCTR | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ZM - FCTR | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| RSG - FCTR | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| MMC - FCTR | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| LW - FCTR | 16% Poorly correlated | +4.52% | ||
More | ||||
ZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y